Just four years after the Taj opened its doors, it was up there among the best in the world. Remarkably, The New York Times writer chose to mention the upstart over older hotels in the city.
There are many stories about why Tata Group founder, Jamsetji Nusserwanji Tata, built the Mumbai Taj, the first property set up by the Indian Hotels Company, which he started. One story goes that it was because Tata suffered the personal humiliation of being turned away from a Mumbai institution, identified variously as Watson's Hotel, or The Majestic, or the Royal Bombay Yacht Club - that in those days served whites only. But according to Raymond Bickson, Managing Director of the Taj, the impetus was a newspaper editor's complaint to Tata that there were no good hotels in Bombay.
1902-03 was the dawn of an era that saw modern influences in art and architecture (think Lutyens), and leaps in technology such as the Wright Brothers' first flight
Then came the battle between him and Ratan Tata for control of the company, which Tata eventually won. And in 2008, the world looked on aghast as the army, police, and hotel staff struggled to free the Taj from terrorists following the attack on November 26. During the siege, the hotel's general manager, Karambir Kang, helped guests out of the building even as his own family remained trapped and perished in their living quarters on the top floor.
|Established in 1902|
1902: J.N. Tata incorporates the Indian Hotels Company
1903: Indian Hotels opens its first hotel, Taj Mahal Palace, in Mumbai, opposite the Gateway of India
Fort Aguada Beach Resort, in Goa
1974: The group opens its first resort, Fort Aguada Beach Resort, in Goa
1980: The group ventures abroad with the Taj Sheba in Sanaa, Yemen
1997: Ratan Tata takes over as Chairman
2003: The flagship property is rebranded as Taj Mahal Palace and Tower. Raymond Bickson takes over as the first expat CEO
2004: The first Ginger budget hotel comes up in Bangalore
The Taj is damaged in the Mumbai terrorist attacks on Nov 26, 2008.
November 26, 2008: The Taj is damaged in the Mumbai terrorist attacks, and closes for renovation
2009: The Vivanta by Taj brand is launched in the Maldives
2010: The renovated heritage wing of the Taj, Mumbai, reopens; US President 1997 Obama visits
The Taj Mahal Palace, Mumbai, and the Gateway of India
Not many are aware that the other hotel to be attacked by terrorists on 26/11, the Oberoi, had its own little run-in with the Taj in the 1970s. In June1974, owner M.S. Oberoi wrote to J.R.D. Tata, complaining that Air India was giving the Taj an undue share of its business, at the cost of the Oberoi-Sheraton at Nariman Point.
At the time, J.R.D. Tata was chairman of both Air India and Indian Hotels. He took his time to reply, but when he did, he reminded Oberoi that his hotel was only two years old, and the Taj was 70. Tata, wearing his Air India hat, also reminded Oberoi that tourists flown in by the national airline were not charged extra by the Taj if they turned up before the noon check-in time, while the Oberoi-Sheraton, by contrast, billed half-rate. He ended the letter by saying: "As chairman of Indian Hotels, I have deliberately kept right out of any allocation of business as between hotels, and have left it entirely to the management."
Ravi Shankar and George Harrison;
Under Ratan Tata, Indian Hotels has become truly global. It has a Hawaiian, Bickson, at the helm, and has been picking up prestigious properties, such as The Pierre in New York and the Ritz-Carlton in Boston.
It has also ventured into other categories, with the Ginger budget hotel chain, and the four- and fivestar chains, Gateway and Vivanta by Taj. The group has a presence worldwide, and recently entered China. It is currently in the middle of a Rs 960-crore expansion programme announced last year.
Hotel guests arrive at Taj
But there have been setbacks too, chief among them the group's failure to acquire Orient Express, the American luxury hotel chain. The Tatas picked up a 10 per cent stake in the company in 2006, but Orient Express rebuffed the group's approach to collaborate, and created its own defence mechanism in the form of a convoluted corporate holding structure that forced the Tatas to exit the company a year later. The Orient Express management even said that associating its brands with the "predominantly domestic" Indian chain would lead to an erosion of its "brand and business value".
Another century, another snub. Things could get interesting